Do I Need Net Framework 2.0?
EXCELLENT article!!May 10, 2016 Glen A Goodale This is quite informative. The MS site is a mess in determining this. any comments are appreciated. Thanks for this information as a regular software I thought 3.5 will take care of all the previous versions, but I was wrong it is still asking me to install 1.1
Some programs need this to be able to run.Rick Flag Permalink This was helpful (0) Collapse - WHAT IS MICROSOFT .NET FRAMEWORK 2.0 & WHAT IS IT NEEDED FO by ronalds173 http://www.askvg.com/guide-what-does-ia64-or-itanium-based-system-mean-is-it-different-from-x64-64-bit/ laalmi nasser That's helpful sourcy and juicy page on MS NetFX .Thank you for all! You may be instructed to download it. Is there a version of .NET that is compatible with Vista that might work for my software? .NET is compatible with Vista.
But after installing .Net 3.5 framework, current running application is not working properly. I talked to the software tech support, they said the problem was with MSoft, not them, so they wouldn't help. Then, someone is saying that we should just keep all the versions on our computers because MY harddisk space is cheap and MY time spent fixing it is not. Thanks Reply Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply.
Mono is a free and open-source project designed to provide compatibility between .NET applications and other platforms, especially Linux. Representation of Rational Numbers Why is the Id of the detail page URL different from the Apex context? by R. https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-performance/do-i-need-to-keep-both-microsoft-net-framework-20/598894e0-09e1-4906-8ecb-6df5c7d5066f Now it's cross platform, it's even more useful.
This is not only grossly dishonest, but a HUGE waste of disk space for something you don't need that has security issues. Keep up the good work. I don't know. You just need it to work.
Now, about those versions. http://www.techspot.com/community/topics/ms-net-framework-2-0-3-0-3-5-etc-do-i-really-need-all-any-of-them.134967/ Apps written to versions 3.5 and lower will require version 3.5 to be installed, and apps written to version 4 or higher will need version 4 installed. If you have a question, start by using the search box up at the top of the page - there's a very good chance that your question has already been answered Moshe Natan March 5, 2009 2:34 PM Leo!
Microsoft really irritates me, but I use it because of its plug and play interoperability and because once you start with it (back in the 80's), it is too much of Report estebanrey- Apr 8, 2010 10:06AM The .NET Framework packs are needed for running any programmes that are built with them. More about Leo. Thanks! - Leo14-Nov-2008 Bill Yourconis November 18, 2008 8:44 AM I have had the experience you mentioned in this answer.
here is a link to device drivers for XPhttp://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/support/driver.mspxor http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319908 .Netframe is an essential systems execution software. Reply Billy March 20, 2015 at 9:06 am # Thanks Mate, Very helpful! So, I uninstalled IE8 and am back with IE7 (which I should have done in the first place!). I wonder if some of the users of this library, if I can get by with using that term here, will be as non-compliant with these design standards as they were
http://goo.gl/A3qQ Reply kaybabs February 21, 2013 at 10:11 am # you too much. and what is with this visual basic anyway? Reply Belel April 3, 2013 at 4:57 am # @Brain i tried the above procedures but its not working and its gives me error code, am confused.
Dismiss Notice TechSpot Forums Forums Software Apps & Software Today's Posts MS .Net Framework 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, etc, do I really need all/ any ofthem?
daniel mays December 9, 2010 8:47 AM i have deleted the .net frame work . Once that is done, restart the computer and rerun Windows updates. That's a great way to look at it, for those of us that used or remember VB - particularly since with the advent of VB.NET, the .NET framework kind of is TechSpot Account Sign up for free, it takes 30 seconds.
I was warned that several programs wouldn't work if I continued with the uninstall, but I thought that as I would be reinstalling immediately, everything would be OK. It was a mess, but I knew it had to be done. It allows developers to write code using their preferred language and be assured that code can run wherever the framework is supported. by Leo A.
But the solution is simple: leave them there. by Kees_B Forum moderator / March 12, 2011 6:44 AM PST In reply to: But if you want to download .Net 2.0 http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2009/01/22/9372100.aspxKees Flag Permalink This was helpful (0) Collapse - Download Link for Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0 Download Link (Web Installer) (requires Internet connection at installation time) Full Standalone Offline Installer Above standalone installer supports x86, x64 and ia64 architectures but You can actually add them to Windows yourself ahead of time if you want by accessing Windows' optional features.
And, what if I leave out some pieces? guess I'm outta luck. Programs that expect to use version 1, and were tested by their vendors with version 1, get version 1; programs that expect version 2 get version 2, and so on. (Actually, Flag Permalink This was helpful (0) Collapse - Agree with Bob by MarkFlax Forum moderator / April 22, 2012 4:59 AM PDT In reply to: Microsoft.NET Frameworks 2.0, 3.0, 3.5 all
That is, I had non responsive start ups to IE8 before I did uninstalled the later version of .net framework and I still get the same non responsive start ups with As insecure as it may be (not arguing that), the practical reality is that a lot of software depends on it and its various versions. sherry November 9, 2010 10:39 AM I recently installed microsoft security essentials.
© Copyright 2017 draw3lines.com. All rights reserved.